Patched vs Stable install images/iso
It looks like NetBSD is developing numerous versions of install images.
while netbsd-6-0 denotes the images as 'NetBSD-6.0.1_PATCH-amd64.iso'
I am assuming the 4.0 is a typo.
It seems these are backwards. If I wanted to try NetBSD 6.0 with security/critical fixes I would assume this to be stable. If I wanted new features the PATCH connotation seems more appropriate. But then again, I thought stable in FreeBSD meant "stable"
Any NetBSD guru's have any insight?
|Thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Security Security vulnerability in sudo's netmask function patched||J65nko||News||0||18th May 2012 02:06 AM|
|Some images are black in Firefox||RandomSF||FreeBSD Ports and Packages||14||7th January 2010 08:19 AM|
|Mounting six CentOS iso images on OpenBSD||J65nko||Guides||6||25th November 2009 10:58 PM|
|Official DVD images from FreeBSD team||vermaden||FreeBSD General||0||16th October 2008 07:11 PM|
|Number of Images exceeded||18Googol2||Feedback and Suggestions||2||10th May 2008 10:38 PM|