![]() |
|
|||||||
| General software and network General OS-independent software and network questions, X11, MTA, routing, etc. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
Hello,
Is it just me, or does anyone else see the stupidity of trying for bug-for-bug compatibility. It's a new implementation, so that means you have to make function exactly like the other one - with potentially new bugs in your own implementation. And then - oh, let's intentionally throw in some bugs for flavor. ![]() Why can't they just make a replica sans bugs?
__________________
And the WORD was made flesh, and dwelt among us. (John 1:14) |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Quality and Backwards Compatibility of GNU Tools ... | vermaden | Off-Topic | 1 | 12th May 2009 08:25 PM |
| Encrypted disk compatibility issue | TheLogicInverter | FreeBSD Security | 3 | 30th January 2009 01:59 PM |
| I need help fixing Linux compatibility problems. | troberts | FreeBSD General | 1 | 14th May 2008 04:26 PM |