![]() |
|
|
|
|||
|
The compat is not needed. You'll be safe.
|
|
|||
|
Welcome!
This new discussion topic was separated from the original thread. We find that most members extensively search these forums for information. As such, we attempt to keep threads limited to one topic -- as defined by the person originating the thread. Keeping discussion focused helps later readers piece together pertinent information. |
|
||||
|
Hello and thanks for the answer. I have heard some admins still run FreeBSD 4.X etc. even though an older release such as this might no longer be supported. I suppose the compatibility is for these people then. Regards
|
|
||||
|
Dear forum,
I found the appropriate manual page for NetBSD detailing the various compat options Code:
man 4 options Quote:
http://netbsd.gw.com/cgi-bin/man-cgi...s+4+NetBSD-5.1 |
|
||||
|
As far as FreeBSD, I have not been able to locate a manual page with similar documentation on the compat options other than just reading the kernel config file itself. If anyone knows please let me know. Regards
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| compatibility layers | BSDfan666 | OpenBSD General | 7 | 6th April 2011 02:17 AM |
| Urtw driver compatibility question | Alex_Dc | OpenBSD General | 14 | 13th February 2010 10:31 PM |
| Quality and Backwards Compatibility of GNU Tools ... | vermaden | Off-Topic | 1 | 12th May 2009 08:25 PM |
| Encrypted disk compatibility issue | TheLogicInverter | FreeBSD Security | 3 | 30th January 2009 01:59 PM |
| Bug-For-Bug Compatibility | JMJ_coder | General software and network | 2 | 12th September 2008 07:03 AM |